Semantic Differential Judgments of Cooperators, Competitors and Individualists at Zero-Acquaintance
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
This research focused on the target effect on a perceiver's judgments of personality when the perceiver and the target are unacquainted. The perceiver was given no opportunity to interact with the target, a condition we refer to as zero acquaintance. We reasoned that in order to make personality judgments, perceivers would use the information available to them (physical appearance). Consensus i...
متن کاملTrust at Zero Acquaintance
Trust is essential for a secure and flourishing social life, but many economic and philosophical approaches argue that rational people should never extend it, in particular to strangers they will never encounter again. Emerging data on the trust game, a laboratory economic exchange, suggests that people trust strangers excessively (i.e., far more than their tolerance for risk and cynical views ...
متن کاملBiofuels and Broilers --- Competitors or Cooperators
The rapid increase in production of ethanol from corn and other grains and biodiesel from various fats and oils has resulted in growing quantities of byproducts from these industries, primarily distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) from the ethanol industry and glycerol from biodiesel production. The use of DDGS in poultry and swine diets is not new, but the supply of product encourages ...
متن کاملRating E-mail Personality at Zero Acquaintance*
Electronic media are pervasive in daily communication. But how well can personality traits be perceived through a short e-mail message? Working independently and under experimenter supervision, thirty judges each rated 18 short e-mail texts. These texts were written under experimental conditions by authors of known personality, who briefly described their recent activities, and were collected a...
متن کاملConsensus at zero acquaintance: replication, behavioral cues, and stability.
That observers tend to agree in their ratings of a target even if they have never interacted with that target has been called consensus at zero acquaintance. The basic finding that consensus is highest for judgments concerning a target's degree of extraversion (EV) and somewhat weaker for judgments of conscientiousness is replicated. Several potential observable cues that might be used by judge...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1884-927X
DOI: 10.5178/lebs.2010.6